The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian, Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates how many students from Iran, Greece and Turkey registered in Sheffield University over a 5-year period from 2005. In general, what stands out from the graph is that whereas the figure of Iranian and Turkish students rose over the period, Greek students’ popularity witnessed a dramatic decline.
Focusing on students from Iran and Turkey, the number of which started at 38 and 20 respectively. The figures gradually grew in similar proportion, with two overlaps in the middle of 2006 and 2008. However, during the last phase of the period, the figure of Turkish students experienced a marginal growth until it reached its peak at around 120 pupils in 2009, while the number of Greece students considerably improved and peaked at 160 pupils in the same year.
By contrast, regarding Greek students, there was a slight decrease from 180 in the first year of the period before seeing a dramatically fall to approximately 70 students in the next year. This was followed by a levelling off and ended with a marginal slip to solely 42 pupils.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
... first year of the period before seeing a dramatically fall to approximately 70 students in the nex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, regarding, so, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00558659218 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71407204636 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631284916201 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2366406191 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169867241996 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743429836609 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565630990823 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109891698098 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600030799968 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.