The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian, Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph illustrates how many citizens of Iran, Greece and Turkey became students of the University of Sheffield over the five years period from 2005 and 2009.
It is clearly seen that the number of Greeks was the highest in the beginning among given countries falling to the lowest value at the end of given time interval. On the other hand, the number of students from Iran and Turkey rose considerably.
The number of Iranians and Turkish students stood at 20 and about 39 people in 2005, respectively. Then both groups experienced a gradual increase over the entire period, after which Iran reached 140, whereas Turkey achieved more than 120 students.
Meanwhile, there were almost 180 Greeks in the first year of the reported period. Over the next two years, the number of them diminished significantly and leveled off at around 70 students in 2007, when Turkish citizens overcome Greeks. In the last year there was a sharp fall, hitting the bottom of just above 40 students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-04 | Le Trang | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | Komaldeep Sandhu | view | |
| 2021-12-29 | thienan8443626 | view | |
| 2021-12-19 | thienan8443626 | view | |
| 2021-06-29 | AltynS | 60 | view |
- The pie charts below give information about the percentages of the world population living in various parts of the world in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend It should be limited To what extent do you agree 89
- The chart shows the percentage of men and women living in poverty divided into ten different age groups in the United States in 2008 67
- The graphs below show the post school qualifications held by Canadians in the age groups 25 to 35 and 45 to 55 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries What problems does this cause What can be done to deal with this situation 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93452380952 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46867420375 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64880952381 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2678835197 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.625 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190568770392 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832296101185 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718419614882 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113167006012 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215447112063 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.