The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian, Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts the enrolment rate of students from three distinct countries at Sheffield University from 2005 to 2009.
Overall, while the figure for Iranian and Turkish enrolling scholars saw an upward trend, the number of those from Greece experienced an inverse tendency at the same time.
Initially, the figures for Iran and Turkey were relatively the same, with a difference of merely 20 students. In 2006, the number of registered students from Turkey surpassed that of Iran, after which the former experienced a much deeper surge than the latter did. The following years witnessed a steady growth in both figures, in addition to a significant increase of more than 50 in the number of Iranian students in 2008. Consequently, Iran and Turkey hit their peaks at 160 and 120, respectively.
Meanwhile, starting at 180 students, the figure for Greek scholars was exceptionally higher than the rest; however, it then experienced a substantial downward trend by more than a half. After this, one-year stability was witnessed in 2007, followed by a noticeable fall in 2009 to less than a quarter, compared to the initial figure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir peaks at 160 and 120, respectively. Meanwhile, starting at 180 students, the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13978494624 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80385493516 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629032258065 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4841380358 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159556057977 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693803838837 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723787587925 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11393394943 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078516910801 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.