The line graph shows the average prices of tickets sold at a theatre and the and the bar chart show the average percentage of tickets sold in 2010 and 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The rendered line graph illustrates the information about the average cost of tickets at cinema and bar graph depicts the average number of tickets that were sold in 2010 and 2011. The data has been calibrated in pounds and percentage.
In an overview, the prices of tickets were increased in 2011 as compared to prices in 2010, however the percentile of sold tickets was decreased.
After having a glimpse it can be clearly seen that 9.25 pounds were the cost of tickets in the first quarter of 2010 and this value remains same until second quarter, but after this period of time there was a significant increase observed in the prices of tickets which approaches to 10.5 pounds in 3rd quarter and remain constant till second quarter of 2011. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2011 the price of tickets were declined by 2.5 pounds from £10.5 ,strikingly, the price of tickets were inclined with the same figure in the last quarter of letter year.
Probing further to the remaining data, in first two quarters the percentage of sold tickets was equal, accounted as 60% in 2010. Similarly, 20% tickets were sold in 2011 in each of the first two quarters. Moreover, almost 50% and exactly 50% tickets were sold in third quarter in 2010 and 2011 respectively. Likewise, in fourth quarter the percentage of sold tickets was 80 and 70 in 2010 and 2011 respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y seen that 9.25 pounds were the cost of tickets in the first quarter of 2010 and...
^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...me until second quarter, but after this period of time there was a significant increase observ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2011 the price of tickets were declined by 2.5 pounds from £10.5 ,strikingly, th...
^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... were declined by 2.5 pounds from £10.5 ,strikingly, the price of tickets were in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, similarly, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82627118644 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55540094173 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483050847458 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.1397345264 43.030603864 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 126.555555556 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320253918762 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171981502021 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112786137558 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246412309395 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941567531137 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.