• The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014
The line graph illustrates the number of books that were loaned in four consecutive months from West Eaton, Rye Slip, Sutton Wood, and Church Mount libraries over a 3-month period, starting in June 2014.
Overall, it can be seen that the majority of the books were borrowed from Rye slip and Sutton libraries over the time frame, whereas the lowest and same number of books were loaned from West Eaton and Church Mount Libraries at the beginning of the period.
Looking at the data sets of Rye slip and Sutton in more details, it is evident that at beginning of the time period, the highest number of books borrowed from Rye Slip at a figure of 300, while the second highest number of books were borrowed from Sutton libraries, and that figure was 250. In July, the number of books that were lent from Sutton Wood library increased slightly to around 260, and then it showed a dramatic decline in August at a figure of 100. However, at the end of the period, the number of books that were loaned from Rye slip decreased gradually to approximately 180, whereas, it was increased sharply from the lender of Sutton Wood, and reached at a figure of 300.
In terms of West Eaton and Church Mount, it is clear that over the given period, there was a consistent increase in the number of books borrowed from West Eaton and Church Mount libraries. Both of them lent only 50 books in June. Over the next three months, the number of borrowings increased more for West Eaton than for Church Mount. However, in September, both of them lent 150 books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Wood, and reached at a figure of 300. In terms of West Eaton and Church Mount,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, second, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61594202899 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21639648045 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.409420289855 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.5617613938 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.555555556 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283385340715 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130199825917 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963742712521 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203265904513 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095184265232 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.