the line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type that were borrowed over this time. summarize the information by selecting and

Essay topics:

the line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type that were borrowed over this time. summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons were relevant.

The line graph illustrates the amount of books that were lent in June, July, August and September in the year 2014 from West Eaton, Ryeslip, Sutton Wood and Church Mount libraries. While, the pie chart provides information about the rates of books that were lent by category during this time.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the borrowed books from West Eaton Church Mount and Sutton Wood libraries with some fluctuation in the last mentioned, however, the Ryeslip library showed a downtrend. Also, the biggest type of borrowed books was the Fiction category, however, the smallest type went to Self-Help books.
Firstly, West Eaton and Church Mount libraries rose sharply during the period as about 150 books, while West Eaton library showed a period of stability between August and September, and Sutton Wood library experienced a gradual increase to July with around 275 books, then it fluctuated and it felt down to 100 books in August, finally it peaked up to 300 books in September. About Ryeslip library Showed a sharp decline during the period and recorded less than 200 books in September.
Thereafter, the fiction section was the biggest category and it was 43 percent, followed by the Biography and it recorded about one-fifth lastly, while the Self-Help books was the lowest borrowed type and scored only 10 percent.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...Sutton Wood and Church Mount libraries. While, the pie chart provides information abo...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39038257842 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.8128808366 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 159.714285714 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5714285714 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241024048631 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132168307916 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602039713223 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15525391979 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086006753147 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.