The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand

The line graph provides information about the fiscal matters for a local authority from 2012 to 2022.
Overall, it can be seen that there is an upwards trend for the revenue's rates and user charges, while borrowings shows a downwards trend and the grants and subsidies examine a period of fluctuation.
First of all, the revenue rates and user charges were 1500 and 1000 respectively in 2012 and started to increase dramatically during the period till the year 2018 and they scored almost 2000 and 1700 millions respectively. Furthermore, it estimated to be increased and to peak at approximately 2500 and 2000 millions in 2022.
While, borrowings showed an increase from 2012 to 2014 at about 1200 millions, and it fluctuated to the year 2017 and scored near to 1000 millions. Moreover, there was a period of stability till 2019 and it projected to increase at 1400 millions in 2020 and decrease then stable at 800 millions in 2022.
Finally, the grants and subsidies were less than 500 millions in 2012 and increased sharply with intersection with borrowings line at about 750 millions. Then, it started to decrease gradually to be estimated to decline at approximately 500 millions in 2022.

Votes
Average: 4.2 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are an upwards'?
Suggestion: there are an upwards
... to 2022. Overall, it can be seen that there is an upwards trend for the revenues rates and user c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, moreover, then, while, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80668844014 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2958331281 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103344094877 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543546865897 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833175557069 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808601802567 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956837465242 0.0819641961636 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.