Contained in the line graph provided is data pertaining to the number of books borrowed from four village libraries from June to September in 2014, and the pie chart illustrates the proportion of book types borrowed during the same period.
Overall, the number of books borrowed in West Eaton, Sutton Wood and Church Mount represented an upward trend, whereas the trend in Ryeslip was downward. It is also obvious that fiction was the most popular type of book in the four villages.
In regard to the data in the line graph, one sees the pattern of increase in the number of books borrowed in three villages, except for Ryeslip. It is evident that the number of books which were borrowed by citizens in West Eaton and Church Mount grew gradually over the period, jumping from 50 in June 2014 to 150 books in September 2014. In Sutton Wood, the number of books borrowed here demonstrated a slight rise from 250 to 300 books by the end of the period after a remarkable dip to 100 books in August 2014. Nevertheless, the trend was different in Ryeslip as the number of books dropped steadily to approximately 175 books in September 2014, even though it started from the highest number, 300 books, at the beginning of the period.
Turning to the pie chart, people in four villages prefered fiction to other types of books. It is clear from the chart that the proportion of fiction books gained considerably 43%, while biology made up 19% in total. Furthermore, either history or science had the same proportion at 14%. Finally, there was only a small percentage of 10% in self-help books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...nd of the period after a remarkable dip to to 100 books in August 2014. Nevertheless,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, except for, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73741007194 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49099875333 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507194244604 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9803329437 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.727272727 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406472382157 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156712840278 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104225959788 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254623662929 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107757445827 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.