Here, the chart demonstrates the information about the finances for local government in New Zealand from the year 2012 to 2022, units are measured in millions.
Overall, It is manifest that the most striking finance is rates revenue which dominates the market, however, grants and subsidies are made the least amount of finance, and the rest of the finances is fluctuation.
At a first glance, the chart reveals that during the period from 2012 to 2013 the ratio of rate revenue was presented constant at around $1,500 million it expected to be modestly inclined to nearly $2,500 million. With regards to user charges finances, the amount was $1000 million in the year 2012 then slightly rocketed to well above $1000 million, It was estimated to reach up to $2000 million at the end of the stipulated period.
Further analysis of the line chart portrays that the proportion of borrowings finances were presented just below $1000 million then the identical amount could be observed in 2017 after reached to lowest. It is interesting to note that from the period 2017 to 2019, the amount had been continuous then sudden rise up to $1000 million, the ratio would be almost less than $800 million. It can be seen that initially the ratio of grant and subsidies were presented just below $500 million in 2012, then it projectile period from 2015 to 2017 at more than $600 million. the grant and subsidies' projected value will be at around $500 million in 2022.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...evenue were presented constant at around ,500 millions the it expected to be modes...
^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...sented constant at around ,500 millions the it expected to be modestly inclined to nea...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pected to be modestly inclined to nearly ,500 millions. With regards to user charg...
^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...012 then slightly rocketed to well above 000 millions, It estimated to reach up t...
^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...est. It is interesting to note that the from the period 2017 to 2019, the amount had...
^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 000 millions, the ratio would be almost less than 00 millions. It can be clearly...
^^
Line 5, column 575, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... 2015 to 2017 at more than 00 millions. the grant and subsidies projected value wil...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82071713147 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50720774907 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498007968127 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2801297893 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.25 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.375 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0962539488607 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544629408554 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720945355286 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090009589573 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831732860714 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.