The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country from 1978 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country from 1978 to 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison where relevant.

The given column graph illustrates the information about proportion of different age groups who visited thretre in a specific nation between 1978 to 2008.

Overall, it is clear that portion of young ones who visited cinema was higher. However, less preference was given by old aged people to thretre.

To begin with, during 1978, the proportion of people who belong to 50+ age group was only two fifths ;however, about 90% of youngsters visited cinema in that year. In initial year, the percentage of people stood at 60% and 90% who were middle aged and aged between 24-35 years. In following decade, the proportion of old ones decreased dramatically and reached at a half but after that it experienced a gradual incline and till 2008 it reached at a half.

Probing further, in case of 35 - 49 years old, after a rapid decline since 1988 the proportion of people rose slightly and got fraction equal to old people in last year which was two quarters. While age group 25-34 also followed similar trend ,up to 1988 the proportion of cinema visitors reached at nearby three fifths and remained stable till last decade. Strikingly, the preference of young ones also witnessed a drop after 1978 but then followed by fluctuations and reached at about 85% in 2008.

Votes
Average: 9 (32 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at 60% and 90% who were middle aged and aged between 24-35 years. In following ...
^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were middle aged and aged between 24-35 years. In following decade, the proporti...
^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atically and reached at a half but after that it experienced a gradual incline an...
^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... group 25-34 also followed similar trend ,up to 1988 the proportion of cinema visi...
^^
Line 7, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ree fifths and remained stable till last decade. Strikingly, the preference of yo...
^^
Line 7, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f young ones also witnessed a drop after 1978 but then followed by fluctuations a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86111111111 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51888743316 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560185185185 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5157266052 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140754683966 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683050197793 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572604614157 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105936309206 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602472482617 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.