The line graph shows the percentage of the uses of five modern technological devices (CD, DVD, Computers, Mobile Phones, and internet) from 1997 to 2001 in the UK.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of the use of computers, mobile phones, CDs, the internet, DVDs, in the UK between 1997 and 2001.
In 1997, 60% of DVDs used in the UK. This figure fell before rising steeply to reach a peak of 80% in 1998. From then on, however, it decreased steadily to a level of about 10% in 2001.
In 1997, half of all CDs used in the UK. The growth in this category was constant over the period. Mobile phones were used in 1997, in the UK with the beginning at 40%, and this figure climbed swiftly progressing 5 years and traversed to 80% by 2001. On the other hand, using the computer was 20% in 1997, although the growth of this category also increased dramatically, rising from about 20% to around 90% during the period. The proportion of the usage of the internet was 10% in 1997. It gradually increased and reached 40% in 2001.
Overall, the percentage of using the computer was the highest of four classes of technological devices. This category experienced a sharp growth from 1997 to 2001, whereas there was a continuing upward trend in the using of other devices expect CDs, DVDs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61881188119 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47987685911 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519801980198 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4373856315 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.75 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337971255137 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13344378793 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122694122078 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249992902797 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13993565618 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.