The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the number of stolen cars per thousand ones in four countries: the Uk, Sweden, France and Canada over the period of nine years.

Overall, there was an decline in the number of sloten cars in the UK, France and Canada, while a gradual increase in car theft cases happening was seen in Sweden. In addition, despite fluctuation, Great Britain used to remain the highest rate of car theft among 4 countries examined.

The number of stolen cars in the UK started at approximately 17 cars per thousand vehicles, after which it fluctuated and reached a peak of 20 cars stolen per thousand vehicles in the year of 1996, before ending the period at 16 cars. Similar change can be seen in the figure for those in France, which saw some fluctuation and decreased by 3 cars per thousand vehicles after the period of 9 years analyzed.

The figures for car theft cases in Sweden in 1990 was 6 cars per thousand means of transportation, followed by a considerable rise to 14 cars stolen per thousand ones after 9 years of the period. Meanwhile, about 7 cars per thousand vehicles were stolen in 1990 in Canada, with an insignificant decrease to about 5 cars and a final drop with an gradual rise to 6 cars stolen per thounsand ones.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...od of nine years. Overall, there was an decline in the number of sloten cars in...
^^
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e to about 5 cars and a final drop with an gradual rise to 6 cars stolen per thoun...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63339050586 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.8899780502 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145690137399 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857322896849 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036341036213 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104125235622 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339804924377 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.