The pie charts make a comparison about how to link with the news between Canada and Australia.
It is obviously seen that there are more TV viewers, who listen to the news by watching TV programmes, in Canada than those in Australia, while less people in Canada spend their time surfing the Internet to access the latest news in their country or around the world.
TV is by far the most popular means of media in Australia, accounting for 52%, and online way is the second with 37%. In Canada, in contrast, the proportion of people using TV to update the latest news is 4% higher than that of online users.
Radio, print and other not specified ways are three options for citizens to choose. In Canada, the percentage of print is 14%, which doubles the radio's proportion. However, the number of people choosing radio In Canada is the same as the print's user in Austrailia , with 7%, and radio just accounts for 2%. Other not specified means of media account for 3% and 2% in Canada and Australia respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...n Canada than those in Australia, while less people in Canada spend their time surfi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... media in Australia, accounting for 52%, and online way is the second with 37%. I...
^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prints'' or 'print's'?
Suggestion: prints'; print's
...sing radio In Canada is the same as the prints user in Austrailia , with 7%, and radio...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he same as the prints user in Austrailia , with 7%, and radio just accounts forr 2...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66111111111 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42954505476 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3834416448 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210469155603 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980278487944 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882499569813 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153860326693 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967637499659 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.