The line graph highlights the number of vehicles which were stolen in Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada over a 9-year period from 1990 to 1999.
Overall,it can be seen that car theft rate was far higher than other three countries throughout the whole time frame, While this rate noticeably increased in Sweden.
Focusing on the Great Britain and Sweden, although the former car stalling rate was around 18 per thousand vehicle, the latter car lifting rate was one third of this figure.In Great Britain motor vehicle theft was peak 20 per thousand vehicle in 1993 and 1997, whilst this rate slump to around 16 thousand vehicle in 1999. In Sweden car stolen rate kept on soaring, starting the period at just over 5, and finishing at just under 15 per thousand vehicle.
In contrast, Canada and France remained constant throughout the period but automobile embezzlement was equal 1993 and 1999 around 6 to 8 per thousand vehicle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ear period from 1990 to 1999. Overall,it can be seen that car theft rate was far...
^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...fting rate was one third of this figure.In Great Britain motor vehicle theft was p...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... just under 15 per thousand vehicle. In contrast, Canada and France remained co...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...99 around 6 to 8 per thousand vehicle.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98101265823 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3508292182 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3380126626 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.4 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162228025726 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904330485162 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417874504143 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997605361611 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387016694354 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.