Line Graph
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task:
The graph below shows Internet Users as percentage of population in USA, Mexico and Canada from 1999 to 2009
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The line graph compares the proportions of Internet Users in the population in the USA, Mexico and Canada over a 10-year period from 1999 to 2009.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the percentage of Internet Users in these three countries from 1999 to 2009. Over the period, Mexico had the lowest percentage of Internet Users in population while utilizing the Internet was likely to be more common in the USA and Canada.
In 1999, USA dominated among three countries towards the percentage of Internet Users, at 20%, while the percentage of Mexican Internet Users was negligible, at approximately 5%. With 10% Internet Users in population, Canada was in the middle of USA and Mexico on the graph shown in 1999. And yet, Canada saw the dramatic growth in Internet User percentage and quickly overtook the USA in 2002 as the dominant country which had the highest rate in terms of Internet Users.
From 2002, the proportion of Internet Users in Mexican population rose gradually to 40% in 2009. In a while, the percentage of Internet Users in American population considerably increased until 2005, at 70%, and then levelled off, a rise of a mere 10% over the next 4 years. By contrast, the number of Internet Users in Canada phenomenally grew and eventually widespread in the whole nation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-12-01 | lucluc | view | |
2021-08-12 | thzelda_070195 | view | |
2021-01-19 | Mei Lin_Yu | 56 | view |
2020-12-13 | vothithuymy | view | |
2020-12-13 | vothithuymy | 100 | view |
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Line Graph You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows Internet Users as percentage of population in USA Mexico and Canada from 1999 to 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Line Graph You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows Internet Users as percentage of population in USA Mexico and Canada from 1999 to 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso
- Line Graph You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows Internet Users as percentage of population in USA Mexico and Canada from 1999 to 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68997219562 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481818181818 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1143789187 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.777777778 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329604742818 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173853320933 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781029042739 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248985293106 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651100966123 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.