the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010 summarise the information and make comparison where relevant

The given maps represent before and after development in the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. Overview, it is obvious that the village had a substantial change from an agricultural village into the a residential area.

According to the map in 1930, there were a farmland and some houses in the north of the village. A primary school was located in the center of the town, opposite a post office. Moreover, a large house with gardens was next to the primary schools. There was another farmland in the south of the town that located along the River Stoke.

By 2010, the development had taken place. Many estates were constructed and replaced the farmland in the north. Surprisingly, the primary school was expanded, there were three building in total. In addition, the large house with gardens was reconstructed into a retirement home with smaller gardens. Some parts of the remained garden and the farmland in the south were diminished and replaced by a myriad of houses.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...hange from an agricultural village into the a residential area. According to the m...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93373493976 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68456473048 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2435801863 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.4545454545 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0868768493994 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373755430294 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634108716417 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762623865069 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807363446683 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.