The provided bar graph illustrates the number of various formats of films in each year from 2002 to 2011. The type of formats are categorized into rentals, VHS sales, DVD sales and Blu-ray sales.
Overall, it can be seen that the sales of rental films and VHS decreased over the given period , nevertheless, there were an increase in DVD and Blu-ray sales.
According to the graph, the rentals stated with the figure just above 180,000 in 2002, and there was then a significant decrease during the rest of the recorded period. It ended up with approximately 60,000 in 2011. In addition, there was a substantial fall in VHS sales, beginning with nearly 90,000 in 2002 and falling back to zero in 2006. The sales remained stable at zero until 2011.
On the other hand, DVDs were sold just under 50,000 in 2002, and the DVD sales then reached the peak at 200,000 in 2007. In the following years, there was a moderately decrease to 180,000 in 2011. For the Blu-ray sales, it was in the film markets in 2007, starting with just above zero. The sales of Blu-ray reached 10,000 in 2011.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... and VHS decreased over the given period , nevertheless, there were an increase in...
^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('moderately') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...2007. In the following years, there was a moderately decrease to 180,000 in 2011. For the Blu-ray sal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, then, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6875 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34245031505 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6095586603 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8181818182 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146165869524 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686597359147 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579642825571 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105353485424 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545930958179 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.