Nowadays, many countries are confronted with the problems of obesity and other diet-related diseases due to eating habits of the residents. Some people are in the opinion that rising the tax of food, in particular fast food, is vital for the community. In my opinion, I both agree and disagree with this statement. In the following paragraphs, both of these view points will be discussed in detail before the conclusion is reached.
Increasing the tax of junk food is one of the best practical and reasonable solutions for solving the health problems. By doing this, this kind of food is unaffordable by the citizens and they will buy other food for example vegetable and fruits instead. For example, in some developed countries, their governments rise the tax of some ingredients, especially sugar, to encourage people adding less sugar in their food. Moreover, sugar is one of the main ingredients in myriad of food. Consequently, the rise of sugar tax affect the food price as well.
On the contrary, rising the tax affect not only the wealthy people, but the poverty-stricken have also consequences. Most of the poor people in developed countries do not have too much choice of appetites. For instance, in comparison with the price of food in local restaurants in suburb, hamburger in McDonald are much more cheaper. Despite the problem of being obese, they must continue eating junk food. It would be more struggle in their lives, if the government rose the tax of this food.
To balance, the increase of the fast food tax might be the suitable solution to solve the health issues for some countries, however, the government should also be concerned about the poverty of their resident.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
... suburb, hamburger in McDonald are much more cheaper. Despite the problem of being obese, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in particular, kind of, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99647887324 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78084984634 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5302415879 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391116301087 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130992195646 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650138790289 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235038176084 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368438583635 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.