The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present.
The maps illustrate data on the transformation of a seaside village from 1995 to present.
It is clear that the principal change to the village is the disappearance of agriculture land and the construction of some amenities.
Looking at the maps, as it is in present, we can clearly see that the farmland and forest park had been demolished to make room for a golf course and a tennis yard. There was also a increase in houses and the road had been extended to the southwest. Furthermore, the hotel and the cafe had remained the same while a car park was built next to the hotel.
To the southwest of the maps, the shops had been pulled down to make space for some restaurant. In addition, a new row of apartments had been built to replace the fish market in 1995, and the fishing port had been destroyed completely to give back the beach.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ourse and a tennis yard. There was also a increase in houses and the road had bee...
^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the maps, the shops had been pulled down to make space for some restaurant. In ad...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 689.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47402597403 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67728619304 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5762762923 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4285714286 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123337662793 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737934288807 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129781120973 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123169016564 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153201364348 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.