The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The map illustrates the changes took place in the Ryemouth village in the specific two time periods 1955 and present.

It is clear from the given information that in 1995, there was a farmland area attaching with forest park located to the east side and was a hotel corner of the two roads where two roads intersect, to the south side. To the opposite of the farmland area, a structure of some accommodations built just along the main road in rows and over the roads to the west side. To the south of the housing, a number of shops were developed near to the main road. Moreover, down to the road, there were a fish market,cafe and fishing port, in the sea, to the south side.

Now, farmland and forest park are replaced by golf course and tennis court. Along with this, a cark park facility is added next to hotel. Furthermore, fishing port is now removed from the ocean, and apartments are constructed in the place where the fish market was before. On the place of shops, locals have now new facility of restaurant. What’s more, the number of accommodation have been increased on both sides of the main road, and a new road is now extended towards west.

Overall, the Rymouth village experienced now many significant changes over the period given.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , cafe
...wn to the road, there were a fish market,cafe and fishing port, in the sea, to the so...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...urse and tennis court. Along with this, a cark park facility is added next to hotel. F...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66816143498 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50634538284 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533632286996 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5051056185 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6363636364 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0954425838254 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377959468774 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043632937619 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695097171836 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477647161861 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.