The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school is planned for the area. The map shows to possible sites for the school.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates the entire region and two proposed positions of a new school which will be constructed in Canterbury town.
Generally, both locations express a lack of accessibility to the university zone. However, evident differences between their connections with other places can be easily witnessed.
Turning to the detail, locating in the east and the south parts, respectively, neither S1 nor S2 is well-connected to the university, which is in the northern part of the town. Despite this similarity, S2, conveniently lying in the town centre and being surrounded by housing, becomes more approachable for local citizens rather than countryside-locating S1.
Regarding to transportation, unlike S1, which borders to main road, S2 shows a lack of accessibility for people outside the centre due to its non-existence of traffic zone. Also, residents from Sturry may find S1, which is only 5 to the southwest, more favorable to visit. By contrast, with a 7-kilometer distance along a main road, S2 is more conveniently sited for people from the neighborhood of Chartham.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-23 | phuong cao | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-23 | phuong cao | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet, and they can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The table below shows the number of cars produced in 3 countries between 2003 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- The line graph shows the number of players in four different sports badminton tennis basketball rugby in a particular European country between 1985 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40588235294 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41726230496 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652941176471 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8813553845 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134958412833 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541981420734 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561332988369 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793640597386 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600754427559 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.