The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school (S) is planned for the area. The map shows two possible sites for the school.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given map details two expected locations for building a new school in the town of Canterbury.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that while one of the locations lies in the middle of the map, the other is proposed to be in the countryside area.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, the first possible site is going to be in the heart of the town center, which is a traffic-free zone. Also, this site is surrounded by the residential area, and further by the countryside, with a university to its Northern end. Further, whilst this school location is accessible to a town Chartham via main road connectivity( 7 km away to the Southwest direction with a population size of 4500), Sturry, at 5km away from the town center to the Northeast side with a population of 7000, is also approachable using the main road.
Turning to the other proposal, which is envisaged in the Northeast direction of the countryside, will be more closer to Sturry. By contrast, the same location will be much further away from the town of Chartham. However, being no traffic zone, no connectivity is available from the town center to the second site.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...t direction of the countryside, will be more closer to Sturry. By contrast, the same locati...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, second, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8275862069 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87179866066 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541871921182 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1647050566 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174028575959 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823168651591 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880006355672 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131131706994 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103814624001 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.