The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The 2 maps present how a coast area in Australia changed from 1950 to now.
Overall, it can be seen that there is a great expansion of the road connecting the city and the beach. In addition, there are more recreational destinations for adults compared to the past.
In 1950, the road which linked the nearby city with the beach was ended by a car park on the right, more than 70 years later, the road is prolonged and connects the city with the lighthouse near the beach. In 1950, next to the main road, there were a playground, dining tables, and a pavilion, however, today, the playground has been already replaced by a new car park.
In the past, alongside the beach, there were 2 twenty-five-meters pools located symmetrically. Nevertheless, the pool on the left side has been altered by a 50m one, besides, there are constructions of a restaurant as well as 2 surf clubs, one is next to the lighthouse, one is on the opposite side.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ity with the lighthouse near the beach. In 1950, next to the main road, there were...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n already replaced by a new car park. In the past, alongside the beach, there we...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, nevertheless, well, in addition, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56804733728 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87827097786 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609467455621 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5026724296 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822870978464 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409003274531 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634181204019 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605846722745 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729225816561 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.