The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
The given two pictures compare the layout of the central area of a town named Islip as it is now with a proposed design for development.
Overall, one of the most striking changes to the area is expected to be the introduction of a dual carriageway. Also noteworthy is that the plan involves the addition of various facilities.
At the present, there is a main road crossing the town from west to east. However, in the future, it will be converted into a way for walkers only. Accordingly, traffic will be diverted into the proposed divided highway which surrounds the central area of the town.
It is interesting to note that rows of shops are currently positioned along both sides of the arterial road. Nevertheless, the scheme is to demolish shops to the north side to make way for bus station, shopping centre, car park and residential area. Those to the south, meanwhile, will remain unchanged but the town's park will be reduced in size to create more space which will be turned into housing estate. Finally, no changes will be made to the school and the original housing section located in southern Islip.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...the introduction of a dual carriageway. Also noteworthy is that the plan involves th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, however, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74742268041 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63736749459 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8870937891 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111537263514 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045354198559 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431523222808 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786073236446 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503601958316 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.