The maps below show the centre of a small town called islip as it is now, and plans fot its development.
Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent.
The given two maps illustrates the information regarding the centre of a small town called islip as it is now and they planning for it is development. The data is shown as compass drowned a map.
Overall,the islip town centre now and on the other hand a development diagram illustrates, the planned islip town is structured.
Having quick glence it is apparent that the islip town centre is in the state of the north side. The shops are in sided and front of shops main road and more shops, consequently, the market is running as good. In the centre of there are some places for housing for houses. Therefore, close to housing areas a huge park in the little east side there downside more area for housing and close to west side there is a school it is nicely settled in islip town centre.
Moving towards the second map. In this map all the roads are outside the all other significant buildings, bus station, shopping centre and car park these all building are starred in north west side new housing area is in the east side area and padestrains road is in the centre despite close to padestrains there are some shops, moreover in the south side in south west side have some housing area and proper south new housing and in east side tiny park is there im the outside area of south housing area and school lastly, dual carriageway in the west side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...n as compass drowned a map. Overall,the islip town centre now and on the other ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, lastly, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57142857143 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36233106909 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440816326531 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 142.263448886 43.030603864 331% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163804777027 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102228400724 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106461355511 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162931572103 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112554366289 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.