The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart elucidates the information regarding the proportion of people visiting the cinema, theatre, library, and zoo. The percentage is divided into three categories which are new migrants born in other countries, new migrants born in English speaking countries and the people who born in Canada.
Having quick glance it is apparent that highest proportion of masses visiting cinemas in Canada are the born in Canada which are 70% whereas, 65% migrants from other English nations visit there and only 50% migrants from other countries go there, probing ahead, significantly the lowest proportion of inhabitants can be seen who are visiting the theatre which are 10% migrants from other countries, 25% from English speaking countries and 20% from Canada born mass. Moving towards the rest of the information the sufficient amount of folks visited on the library in Canada are the new migrants born in other countries which are 50% although, 40% of new migrants born in English speaking regions go there and 37% who born in Canada visited there. Lastly, the minimum proportion of migrants born in other countries is 35 %, 50% from new migrants born in English speaking countries visiting there and 42% born in Canada.
To sum up, it appears that there are fewer people who visit the theatre. On the other hand, the people who go to the cinema have greatly risen the proportion of inhabitants rather than another three categories.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly the lowest proportion of inhabitants can be seen who are visiting the theatre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, regarding, whereas, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11392405063 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57842528646 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434599156118 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.403694931 43.030603864 282% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.142857143 112.824112599 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8571428571 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108803134014 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741761749212 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375539262258 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899463146834 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186323066541 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.