The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps below illustrate the downtown of a small town called Islip as it is present and after development. A major establishment has been done especially to the road circuit. Overall, many sectors have been added to the plan after development.
At the present time, Islip town has two sided shops of the horizontal main road shape, a country side to the north and housing to the south. If you go from west to east there is a cross road that derives you to a school in the town. But if you go from east to west the other cross road leads to a park.
However, as the development plan shows a huge difference in the structure of the main road, from a horizontal shape to a circular one called: Dual Carriageway. At the center, new sectors were established like the bus station, shopping centers and car park. A pedestrian passage is visible with a new housing on the north east.
At the end, the new plan for development consists of couple of new sections that are sufficient for the local people and tourists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to the north and housing to the south. If you go from west to east there is a cro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61413043478 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60831066 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8753823506 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158831763067 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639208256248 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839078981835 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964342173222 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600723014671 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.