The maps explain the improvisation taken place in the seaside resort of Templeton from the period of 1990 to 2005.
Overall, the resort developed over the period with immense number of multistory buildings, establishment of a supermarket. Whereas, large amount of trees decreased in 15 years. Services like taxi,air and also, train were made available by constructing more train tracks but, that led to eradication of connection with river.
In 1990, the resort was densely populated with trees all over and there was just one big building in southwest area. Northeast side of side resort had a school, hospital and railway track, moving downstream towards southeast of track was parking area and little below that was railway station. In the east part of resort was economical area with greenery and small houses.
In 2005, the resort saw rapid development while, the area of school, hospital and railway station remained constant but new train tracks were constructed on the shoreline of sea that led to eradication of connection with south sea part. Also, there were less trees due to more development of multi storey buildings in west region of town.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ldings, establishment of a supermarket. Whereas, large amount of trees decreased in 15 ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , air
...ecreased in 15 years. Services like taxi,air and also, train were made available by ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun trees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...n with south sea part. Also, there were less trees due to more development of multi ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, whereas, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16931216931 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65900259206 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1533641774 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.555555556 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111199541879 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570739865398 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943662515478 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106287937312 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123625405366 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.