The pictures depicts the information about the renovate in a city after the manufacturing of a hydroelectric power dam.
After analyzing it can be seen clearly that in the 1990 forest, ancient structure and rare plants or animals was in west side but in 2010 these were all places finished. Mountains was still at both year. River was very long in former year but latter river was short and created the lake for the tourist.
The sketch further collates that in 1990 year irrigated formations no more near the river. villages seen in former year but latter there was a big hotel established. In 1990 only seen the river but in 2010 near the lake hydroelectric dam set up and electricity tower was created in latter year. In addition, created villages near the river and removed the mountains.
Overall, former year many forest, plants and animals was there but in the latter year electrical dam was setup and hotels or lake created for the tourist.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'depict'.
Suggestion: depict
The pictures depicts the information about the renovate in a...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... pictures depicts the information about the renovate in a city after the manufacturing of a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...created the lake for the tourist. The sketch further collates that in 1990 yea...
^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Villages
...ated formations no more near the river. villages seen in former year but latter there wa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun forest seems to be countable; consider using: 'many forests'.
Suggestion: many forests
... the mountains. Overall, former year many forest, plants and animals was there but in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, still, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80606060606 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50849063234 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4825827508 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1111111111 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0815791756519 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435825134083 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738447855907 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834191126891 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894524652489 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.