The maps below show diverification of island. The first island had not constraction of facility for visitor while the second island had complete fasilities built some fasilities which profitable.

Essay topics:

The maps below show diverification of island. The first island had not constraction of facility for visitor while the second island had complete fasilities built some fasilities which profitable.

Recording to data, the island only had several coconut trees and the corner of left island was found edge of beach that exemplary for swimming and playing while exposing to the sun.
Unlike the second island had development that good for worker who liked holiday. North of island seem nice place for relaxing and swimming. In the middle of island there was a restaurant and beside that it was found a building which extremely good place for making some parties such as wedding party, birthday party, and festival. Beside left and right them were looked lodging for the night that design in accordance with around so that it was seen unique and tidy. Moreover increasingly some coconut trees. Side of island there was pier had the shape of T and point of few there were boats.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...nd so that it was seen unique and tidy. Moreover increasingly some coconut trees. Side o...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, moreover, second, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 641.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 136.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71323529412 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.41495297035 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17377366693 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610294117647 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.9797736464 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5714285714 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284331053914 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134854389766 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753807975405 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230905664129 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010128447184 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.