The maps below show how Science Park has changed from 2008 until now.
The map illustrates some changes to a Science park in 2008 and the same place until now.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that this place has experienced some considerable development during the period shown. The most noticeable differences between the two maps involve building erection and traffic road modernization.
At present, the grassland which is to the north-west of the park completely vanished when a new research and development centre was constructed. While business units, offices opposite the research building and two woodlands between the map have remained unchanged, the reception in front of it has been converted into a university. There also has a bus stop built to the right-handed side of the map, and the main road is widened by an avenue only for cycling.
The most striking update about traffic roads has observed a new three-way path with one connected straight to the railway station, while the others have led to cyber security and an innovation centre. Speaking of those, cyber security has been enlarged significantly since a number of grasslands have been cut off after the given time. Finally, all the woodlands in the left corner of the park have undergone no changes, but the old IT centre has been used for innovative purposes now.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 437, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centres'?
Suggestion: centres
...ve undergone no changes, but the old IT centre has been used for innovative purposes n...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, so, while, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11267605634 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82908943866 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62441314554 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.59781103 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177083832345 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830809987532 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138506940389 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158287481313 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18017897074 0.0819641961636 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.