The maps below show the layouts of the nature Museum between 2010 and 2013.
The diagram illustrates the layout of the nature museum as it was in 2010 and how the same area looked in 2013 after having been developed
In general, the area underwent drastic changes in facilities. The most significant difference could be seen in the removal of a garden and the construction of more facilities.
In terms of transformation in facilities, the mammals were removed to erect an ice age in the northwest, and insects were constructed in the southwest of the corner of the mammals. Moreover, Ocean Hall was greatly extended, making it increase in the size space for playing facilities for kids, and several facilities stayed unchanged in the nature museum which were the Dinosaurs, Ticket desk, Entrance, and Lobby.
As far as development in facilities was concerned, the garden on the northeast was chopped down to make a way for more facilities, the Human ongins display was built opposite the café located in the southeast corner. Another transformation is that a shop was erected in close proximity to the center in the south. The mammals were relocated in front of the Human ongins display in the northeast.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oked in 2013 after having been developed In general, the area underwent drastic c...
^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...formation is that a shop was erected in close proximity to the center in the south. The mammals...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00529100529 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88468015222 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566137566138 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.6782065446 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.142857143 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0946624157661 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396687273525 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743270846248 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794812582702 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111353123492 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.