The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps present the science park, in its current structure and its appearance in 2008.
Overall, it is clear that the park is now more accessible and is easier to navigate since the current set-up includes multiple transport stations and road types. There is also a greater focus on scientific and educational venues, at the expense of greeneries and administrative sites.
Previously, a considerable part of the park was occupied with grassland and woodland spread all around the area. The car park, located right in the center, had connection trails to business units, offices and reception to the north and cyber security to the south. The IT centre was positioned between the road that run through the middle of the area and the railway at the south end.
At present, the cyber security point extends towards the midway at the expense of the car park. In the northern part of the science park the grassland zone is now the space for the research and development building and the reception is turned into the university hub. The most significant development in the southern part is the railway station opening which created additional connection points to the cyber security, car park and the innovation centre that replaced the IT one. The roads are now complemented with the cycle lanes and there is a bus stop on the eastern part of the road. There are, however, no significant alterations to the woodland spots, so as to the offices and business units.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'The' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: The; IT
... north and cyber security to the south. The IT centre was positioned between the road ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centres'?
Suggestion: centres
...and cyber security to the south. The IT centre was positioned between the road that ru...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 469, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...and the innovation centre that replaced the IT one. The roads are now complemented wit...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 660, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...cant alterations to the woodland spots, so as to the offices and business units.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91967871486 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66607991803 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3462214657 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.363636364 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132685043594 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513327550534 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516910512452 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094225919167 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527210523595 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.