The passage and the lecture is about originality of Jane Austens’ full-length portrait. The author of the article shows 3 evidence of it, but the speaker convinces that they can be hardly proved.
The passage and the lecture is about originality of Jane Austens’ full-length portrait. The author of the article shows 3 evidence of it, but the speaker convinces that they can be hardly proved.
Firstly, the passage states that Austen’s family approved the usage of Jane’s portrait as an illustration on her letters and they confirmed that she is pictured on the paining. The lecturer, on the other hand, does not agree with this statement because the portrait was published 70 years after the death of the novelist, so her family has never seen her alive, so they can not say for sure is she on the picture or not.
Secondly, the writer tells that the face of Jane on the portrait is similar to the sketch of Cassandra, who depict Jane. However, the speaker says that the novelist’ family was large and there were a lot of female cousins and children. Also she mentioned that this sketch resembles the work of Marian Campien, and it could be a niece of Jane on it.
Thirdly, the passage argues that this piece of art looks like it was painted by Ozias Humphrey, the painter, who was hired by rich Austen’s family exactly at those time when Jane was a teenager. In contrast the lecturer mentions that’s the sign one the cloth, which was used on the painting, was bought when Austen was 27 years old, that is why she could not be pictured on this portrait.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e a lot of female cousins and children. Also she mentioned that this sketch resemble...
^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...those time when Jane was a teenager. In contrast the lecturer mentions that’s the sign o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65163934426 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41616696561 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2802025198 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.111111111 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2222222222 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353064528299 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177418479674 0.0996497079465 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184132227606 0.0662205650399 278% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29911193087 0.162205337803 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.327446352046 0.0443174109184 739% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.