The garph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make the comparisons where relevant.
Representing data in metric terms, the line graph shows the trends in the production of greenhouse gas per capita in four European countries over the period of 40 years from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, both the UK and Sweden took on a course of “green” production, reducing the amount of CO2 pollution. However, despite the downward trend, Great Britain remained the biggest producer of emissions. Also, Italy and Portugal, being far behind at the start, significantly increased their volume by the end of the observed period.
Specifically, the UK was the leader in the production of CO2 fumes in 1967, averaging to 11 metric tonnes, followed by a steady decline to nearly 9 by 2007. Sweden generally reflects this pattern. It came second as a producer of greenhouse gases at about 9 metric tonnes at the beginning, but it recorded a surge in its amount, getting close to that of Britain in 1977 (just above 10 tonnes). From that point on, it fell to under 6 tonnes.
Italy’s and Portugal’s emissions are largely reversed, both showing a stable and considerable rise over the entire period. Portugal generated the least in 1967 (at around 1 tonne), yet its volume had grown fivefold by 2007, becoming equal to that of Sweden. Italy in most respects is quite similar, doubling from the lowest of above 4 tonnes to the highest of nearly 8 and overtaking Sweden in 1987.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87234042553 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71305880772 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629787234043 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1454580514 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.090909091 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160941899502 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560282697147 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440621236126 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930440886264 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423261534789 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87234042553 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71305880772 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629787234043 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1454580514 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.090909091 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160941899502 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560282697147 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440621236126 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930440886264 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423261534789 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.