The graph below Shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information about the amount of carbon dioxide per person which was emitted in four different countries over a 40-year period.
Overall, it can be seen that the amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person decreased in two countries, in the UK and Sweden, whereas increased in other two countries, in Italy and Portugal, over the same period, from 1967 to 2007.
Looking at the chart in more detail, it is clear that the UK is the leader whole period, began approximately 11 metric tonnes per person (mt/p) and decreased to about 9 (mt/p) at the end. Sweden showed a similar trend, the amount of carbon dioxide per person which was emitted in 1967 was about 9 metric tonnes. By 1977, this figure had increased to around 11 metric tonnes. Carbon dioxide emissions was almost 6 metric tonnes per person in Sweden at the end of the period.
Turning to the remained data, it is evident that Portugal was the last one at the beginning, emissions of carbon dioxide per person was 1.5 metric tonnes in 1967. This figure increased to over 2 metric tonnes, almost 4 metric tonnes and about 5 metric tonnes, in 1977, in 1987 and in 1997, respectively. Italy showed a similar trend. The amount of carbon dioxide which was emitted was just over 4 metric tonnes per person in 1967, this figure increased significantly to almost 6 metric tonnes per person in 1997 and remained unchanged between 1997 and 2007.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72177419355 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41224425515 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.411290322581 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.100644119 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.1 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245316680664 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127314251692 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076017543301 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176811991383 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216459526202 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.