Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the acdemic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In modern times, the issue of sharing information has become highly contorversial and an essential part of daily life. There are those who say that it is definetely beneficial to share information in scientific area, business or academic as much as we can, however others believe that information can not be shared free because of its importance and value. In this essay I will examine the both views and provide my overall opinion.
Generally speaking, there are two main reasons why people believe that sharing information too much is beneficial. The first idea of this is that people need more and more information about almost every area in daily life, especially in academic and scientific area. For example, a researcher needs to reach rapidly correct and reliable information about his or her research to complete and make a new scientific observation. If he or she could reach information early, he or she would start a new research. Thus, human's researches improve and expand. Secondly, businesshumans have to be aware of every step on their area. As a result, they can invest money correctly to make their company bigger and better.
Despite these arguments, there are also an idea of that information can not be shared free. Perhaps, the main thought which relies on this is that information is quite valuable in global world. Additionally, it has a big importance to share it for free. Secondly, people feel like this because they can start business such as developing websites or phone applications for sharing information to earn money. A good illustration of this is Academia Web which is used by almost every academic in Turkey. This website provides too much researches which were completed by professors all around the world to insight junior academics' questions. It requires 100 pounds to use it monthly.
In conclusion, sharing information has clear benefits and downsides in 21st century. Having considered both views of it, I believe quite strongly that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. It must be said that sharing information should always be free to make our world better place to live by improving our scientific, business academic knowledge. If sharing information and to reach them remain free, academics can reach and share information with their collegues to help each other's researches. Furthermore, they can collect data from shared researches to use them in their own researches.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'new research'.
Suggestion: new research
...nformation early, he or she would start a new research. Thus, humans researches improve and ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ic in Turkey. This website provides too much researches which were completed by prof...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2093.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14250614251 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85576413663 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515970515971 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8517972877 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1363636364 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411984833872 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119994466136 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992408405172 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270068348224 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566466582191 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.