The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps show the significance changes that constructed in the village of Stokeford between the year 1930 and 2010.
The village in 1930 had only several houses along the main road started from the bridge on the North with plenty arable land for farming purposes. But, after 80 years, the main road got splitted into different branches. Both of the farmland that located in the North and near the river stoke got completely demolished and replaced with houses, likewise, primary school got extended and 2 new buildings built attached across each other to the main building. In addition to that, shops, where built besides the post office, also got removed and turned into numerous of houses. Lastly, the garden area got cut into half, again, replaced by houses. In 2010, the large houses from 1930 turned into retirement home and also got 2 extended buildings in both sides. Apparently, houses were additionaly added along the main road that went to South.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- Why are some people who leave school early more successful compared with those who complete their studies Provide reasons why they are more successful and what are the requirement for success 56
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below gives the average time spent and distance traveled by UK commuters in one year Time and distance are given in minutes and miles accordingly Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where rel 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, if, lastly, likewise, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95031055901 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30766866572 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7912394021 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146911176551 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722565518811 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846512405739 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186037680008 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999236269022 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.