The maps below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present.
The two pictures depict how the village called Ryemouth has developed since 1995. Overall, the major changes appeared in the east side of the region. In addition, new infrastructure has also been added to the village during the period.
In 1995, there was a large piece of farmland being in adjacent to the forest park in the east of Ryemouth. Shops and fish market are located in the western area, along both sides of the East-West main road, given the coastal line and a fishing port available nearby. On the other side of the North-South road, a hotel and a café lay opposite to the shops and markets respectively. Several households are situated along the North-South road.
Moving onto the present, a golf field containing two tennis courts has been constructed on the spot where the farmland and the forest park once were. Shops and fish markets now have been replaced by restaurants and blocks of apartment; additionally, the fishing dock was also demolished. A small car park has been built in close proximity to the hotel. Noticeably, one more East – West road has been extended on the basis of the North-South one and some residences have been built along the brand opening road.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...hed. A small car park has been built in close proximity to the hotel. Noticeably, one more East...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85853658537 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5790719524 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570731707317 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9694982608 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5454545455 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0957212036202 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439761055617 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794896368375 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843567692778 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773136569837 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.