The maps show the change in Pentland from 1980 to 2007.
The given maps compare the urban developments that took place in Pentland over a period of 27 years from 1980 to 2007.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the entire place had undergone numerous renovations leading to improved infrastructure, newly launched amenities, and enhanced accessibility.
According to the given illustration, in 1980, the majority of the layout had a grassy area, with a small industrial unit to the West and a car park to the East corner of the middle cross-road. However, over time, the car park was knocked down to extend the road. Also, demolition of the industrial unit led to a multi-story car-park, a swimming pool beside it, some shops to its South, and a small park in the upper left corner.
Furthermore, just to the South end, across the road, a cinema replaced the empty grass area. Another striking change was the evolution of a new residential area to the Southeast corner of the map. Moving on, to its opposite end, on the other side of the road, many new shops were laid down, with new apartments in its North. Further, the cross-road extended to surround the beach area, which finally transformed as Yach marina in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-20 | prathamp114 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | prathamp114 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-27 | pris | 72 | view |
- The tourism industry has grown enormously over the last fifty years and there are few places that are unaffected by it However tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 84
- Some people believe that the government should spend more money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues in cities to make them better places to live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The column graph shows the rate of consumers in three age groups taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016 72
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attractions in Britain in the year 1999 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86666666667 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77607203864 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604761904762 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.837761478 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.555555556 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15804931569 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675768361406 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10305704257 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118622062471 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126874355535 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86666666667 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77607203864 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604761904762 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.837761478 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.555555556 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15804931569 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675768361406 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10305704257 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118622062471 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126874355535 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.