The following maps demonstrate Woodward University campus differences between 1985 and now.
It is evident from the supplied information that, most of the buildings in Woodward University had been changed, refurbished or simplified. This university witnessed demolishes of biology, physics, chemical blocks and car park as well as a diminishment in size of the admin building. Moreover, roads had been replaced by footpaths.
With regards to the North side of Woodward University campus, it is possible to notice that this university had enlarged the library and added the IT center which helps students to access computers for searching for useful exercises or lectures. In the East of the library, science buildings had been combined into one big Science Laboratories making it easier for students to find the building. Meanwhile, they removed the car park and the remaining spaces were used to construct the Lecture Theatre building.
When it comes to the South, according to the 1985 map, the admin building was huge and located in the South East of the campus. It was then reduced in size and relocated near the center of the university. In addition, the area of the shuttle bus terminal now was the location of the old car park in 1985, since Woodward University doesn't have car parks anymore which leads to the substitution of the roads with footpaths.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...sity had enlarged the library and added the IT center which helps students to access c...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centers'?
Suggestion: centers
...d enlarged the library and added the IT center which helps students to access computer...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...park in 1985, since Woodward University doesnt have car parks anymore which leads to t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13901345291 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77995803265 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565022421525 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0982486597 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191229910856 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789485235273 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097985571148 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154855718403 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109045007806 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.