The pie chart provided explains the main factors that lead to the worldwide land degradation, whereas the table illustrated the negative impacts of these causes on three different regions of the world during the 1990s.
It is apparent from the data supplied that over-grazing, over-cultivation, and deforestation were three main reasons why agriculture land becomes less productive. In addition, Europe had the largest amount of land degraded which is shown by the table.
Analysing the pie chart, it can be easily noticed that the proportions of over-grazing, over-cultivation, and deforestation are quite similar constituting with 38%, 28%, and 30% respectively. In contrary, others reasons just accounted for a minor percentage of 7%.
When it comes to the table, during the 1990s, European land was affected significantly in comparison with two others regions attributing for 23%. To be more precise, there were 9.8% of land degraded by deforestation, 7.7% for over-cultivation and over-grazing contributed the least proportion with 5.5%. Surprisingly, in Oceana, there was no agricultural land had been affected by over-cultivation while over-grazing degraded 11.3% land areas, which was the highest percentage among three regions. During the same period, just 5% of the agricultural area of North America became less productive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7263681592 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43309538279 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3367814862 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.888888889 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306903021976 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12209537429 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101824233554 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194143389526 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100057532965 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.