The maps shows how Sidney international airport was in 1930 and how it is today.
The plan A shows the past state while plan B shows the current developments have taken place at Sydney international airport.
Overall, the airport has most notably shown an increase in runway modifications which indicates a higher population of planes and provides some other facilities for the people.
In 1930, only one runway was built but now total four runway have made to facilitate for the planes. The size of the Botany Bay was bigger in past along with river but the area has substantially reduced and more space has been allotted for the river. The terminal which was located at the center of airport has shifted recently to the east side opposite to the runway 4.
Parking facilities were also the main concern in the past but recently extra space have provided for car parking situated on the north and west side of the airport. There is also a provision for the development of hostels on the western side to accommodate for passengers. Moreover, a separate international terminal is also made to overcome the throng.
The ambitious advance map certainly change the outlook of the airport. Also people will welcome the addition of entertainment facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A show' or simply 'shows'?
Suggestion: A show; Shows
The plan A shows the past state while plan B shows the c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'runway' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'runways'.
Suggestion: runways
...one runway was built but now total four runway have made to facilitate for the planes....
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...inly change the outlook of the airport. Also people will welcome the addition of ent...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72319008975 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.510820314 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152730444543 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594206389654 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478587510783 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083061351967 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429047309066 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.