The maps summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016

The maps illustrate the changes Liverpool John Moores University went through since 2010 until 2016.

Overall, the university has experience significant changes over the years of development. We can see that there was some new amenities built around the campus while the admin building placing remains unchanged.

The most prominent change in the layout is the replacement of the road into footpath. In 2010, the northern right side seems to have three different building namely-biology, physics and chemistry which are joined into one science building at present. For the library, the place where it is placed seem to be unchanged regarding the position.

The disappearances of two car parks made way for the constructions of a café, bus station and lecture theatre located at the southeast and the east respectively. Furthermore, there was a construction of IT Suite which was next to the library. On the other hand, admin building which was across the lecture theatre, remained stable over 6 years

Votes
Average: 7.4 (5 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29192546584 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90665976023 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689440993789 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3424894606 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188246788202 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854701756925 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16827086895 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166839163693 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.221159347691 0.0819641961636 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.