Most people think that children born from poor families have more chance in solving intense problems when they grew up as compared to those raised by wealthy parents. Personally, I am agreeing with a statement due to the following reasons.
It can be clearly seen that children who were born from rich personalities rarely teaches their child how tough and unfair life is. They live on the luxury and money that their parent earned without concerning about its worth and values. That is the reason why they do not want to search any possible ways to increase their family finances. In contrast, children born form poor families need to help and support each other about their income to ensure survivability in this harsh world. Also, they rarely grew up with high-tech toys and gadgets like mobile phones or computers and experience all forms of hardships which will greatly benefit them in the future.
When these children become adults, the one who are richer seems to take over their parent heritages or business while others might end up created their own business and generate massive income in the process. Most of these businesses taken over by their offspring mostly tend to unsuccessful. As these people does not face struggles that often during their childhood, they cannot cope with the stress properly, resulted in creating an improper plan and management. Meanwhile, adults who used to face with many problems in their life usually clear their minds and come up with proper and reasonable solutions.
In conclusion, the finances will have a detrimental effect on their future careers. Children born from poor families are more hardworking and determined while the rich ones tend to be lazy and egotistic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...aised by wealthy parents. Personally, I am agreeing with a statement due to the following r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45443549854 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8969085721 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.076923077 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22851554668 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760739342191 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554277224732 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134268003865 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447734734804 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.