The mixed chart below show the percentage children who learn musical instruments from 1996 to 2001 and the choice of musical instruments Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features relevant

Essay topics:

The mixed chart below show the percentage children who learn musical instruments from 1996 to 2001 and the choice of musical instruments. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features relevant.

The given charts illustrate the percentage of children who learned musical instruments in 1996 and 2001 and their selection of instruments in United Kingdom region.
Overall, it can be seen that people in Kingdom region have many children learn musical instruments in both years. However, we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the pie chart, it can be seen that in 1996 children learn a musical instruments is 44%, while 56% did not. Meanwhile, children not learn musical instruments in 2001 was decreased 24% and with learning had significantly increase 76%, highest than in 1996.
Look at the bar chart, the most popular choice among children was piano in 1996 and keyboard in 2016, have both similar level popularity 30%. Meanwhile, lowest among seven choice of children is others and coustic guitar, have number 9% in 1996 and 5% in 2016 of coustic guitar and others only have about 1% and 2% in both years. By contrast, second in high figures is violin and electrical guitar was 12% and 10% of violin, 13% and 19% of electrical guitar. Finally, with more than one instruments is 11% in 1996 and have same number in 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, so it can be seen that children in this country often like piano than other instruments.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...24% and with learning had significantly increase 76%, highest than in 1996. Look at the...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58522296481 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542222222222 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2633868563 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365041088997 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15533048762 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130479045568 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266238052279 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131482450825 0.0819641961636 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.