In the modern world, people no longer need to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
From time immemorial, animals have played a pivotal role in human’s life; they provide not only food but also medicine and clothing for people. It is thought that humans do not make use of these benefits from animals anymore. I, personally, contradict the premise because they presume to live without animals.
To begin with, the majority of food-providing for humans is related to animals and it is essential food. It is conspicuous that people can eat vegetables instead of meat, which, however, gives rise to temporary results, in comparison to animals. Flesh of animals provides nutrients for human’s health and humans are not able to find anything to replace them. For instance, pork and beef help children’ bodies develop in height and weight perfectly.
Additionally, humans can deny the vitality of animals in the process of making medicine and clothing. When it comes to medicine, organisms act as laboratory animals in industry-medicine. When creating new vaccines or treatments for medicine, doctors and scientists are more likely to need laboratory subjects and nothing better than animals. The bodies of animals are fairly similar to humans’, therefore, researchers can gain precise results during the experiment. In terms of clothing, leather and fur are important materials not only for human well-being but also for making an outcome. Taking leather from crocodiles or skin from sheep as examples, the former can produce attractive and valuable products and the latter assists humans adapt with the deeper cool weather. Although humans can make clothes from man-made fabric, it is no longer durable compared to exclusive features from usable parts of animals.
To sum up, owing to the significant role of animals, humans should protect and have sufficient consumption to maintain animals’ value.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 965.302439024 160% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41608391608 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82589523807 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 106.607317073 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618881118881 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 283.868780488 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9907264866 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.266666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233927753691 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820175929823 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716736949408 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140286195645 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712912943749 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 40.7170731707 219% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.