The given line graph depicts the information about number of masses who used five distinct categories of communication resources all over the world.
It can be clearly seen that,use of cellular phone was used by 500 people in 1998 and same as in internet service. After that, use of cellular phone increased dramatically which was used by 6,000 people in year 2006. Whereas, internet service showed very less upward trend as compared to cellular phone service. In year 2008, cellular phone service become more common. Communication service which was used by around 7,000 people and 2,000 people used internet service.
Furthermore, in initial year 1,500 people use landline service. It remained constant till year 2008. Moreover, 0 number people used Mobile broadband and fixed broadband in year 1998 and 2000. In year 2002, very least number of people started using mobile broadband and fixed broadband. Lastly, after that it gradually showed upward trend and 200 people used both broadband services.
Overall, positive trend was seen in cellular phone service and internet service.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...line graph depicts the information about number of masses who used five distinct ...
^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , use
...he world. It can be clearly seen that,use of cellular phone was used by 500 peopl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... showed upward trend and 200 people used both broadband services. Overall, pos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, lastly, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35465116279 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46491744481 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529069767442 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6590099847 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.75 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0999809939534 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469208869167 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337396304177 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0499213614979 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387176911706 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.