The number of subscribers paid for fixed telephone lines and cell phones in Africa from 1994 and 2004.
The line graph illustrates data on the number of landline subscribers and cell phone in Africa, from 1995 to 2004.
As it is observed from the graph, the landline and cellphone subscribers both had an upward trend. It is also noticeable that the amount of people who subscribed to mobile phones exceeded the figure for landline in 2006.
In 1994, Africans subscribers for fixed telephone was at 1.7 , compared to just only 0.06 for cell phones. Over the following six years, the people who subscribed to mobile phone significantly increase to 2, while the figure for landline fluctuated to 2.2.
In the year 2001, the amount of subscribers for both types of phone services was just 2.6 on each. By 2004, the number of people who subscribed to cellphone rose to the peak at 8.8, which was almost three times as much as the figure for landline subscribers at 3.3.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...bscribers for fixed telephone was at 1.7 , compared to just only 0.06 for cell pho...
^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er of people who subscribed to cellphone rose to the peak at 8.8, which was almos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 716.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77333333333 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61727685808 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553333333333 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8257092291 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416830993978 0.215688989381 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220739577221 0.103423049105 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122661771281 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276930914508 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111245521079 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.