The number of tourists visiting Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003 is presented below.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagrams below.
The graph compares the number of visitor in Dubai and Malaysia between 1995 and 2003. Overall more tourist came to Malaysia but after 2000, Dubai climbed and got more visitor than Malaysia.
As it is illustrated, in 1995 foreigner in Malaysia are doubled in number of tourist around 100 thousand compared to Dubai which gain only 50thousand. The next year foreigner in Malaysia increased slightly just over 100 thousand while Dubai as one of middle east countries saw decreased movement. furthermore, from 4 years of period between 1996 to 2000 both Malaysia and Dubai rised rapidly and reached the same number of new comers in 2000, accounting for over than 300 thousand.
In contrast to previous changes, Dubai enjoyed improvement about 75 thousand visitors than before in 2000 while Malaysia experienced decreasement of number of visitors, hit just under 200 thousand. At the end, Dubai had more visitor than Malaysia as one of south asian countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-21 | sannacoconutandmango | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-04 | tronghuy230903 | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-03 | Audric | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | eyraen | 71 | view |
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, sweden,italy, and portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Portugal, and Italy between 1967 and 2007. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
... east countries saw decreased movement. furthermore, from 4 years of period between 1996 to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6046789437 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1111520209 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197981090749 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114211618266 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05620623747 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150259106985 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479407061315 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.